Many articles on wikipedia are erroneous anyway. I tried to modify a couple but have not mastered it. Too many people on wikipedia have their facts wrong when they write up plant articles. I think that Roland and others in favour of using face book are talking of chit-chat with snapshots, which is not meant to compete with the library qualities of the wiki as it exists now, and do not need to be search able. Peter (UK) On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Rodger Whitlock <totototo@telus.net> wrote: > to start using Facebook is a balkanization of "where to find bulb photos > on the web". > > It's quite one thing for PBS to set up a Facebook account and point it to > the > PBS wiki, but that's as far as I would go. Remember, Google indexes the PBS > wiki so someone searching for information on bulbs can find the PBS wiki > easily > enough. > > One thing that could be done to improve things is to make sure that > Wikipedia > articles on specific bulbs include links to relevant articles on the PBS > wiki. > Those who are easy with their photos going into the public domain can also > beef > up Wikipedia with suitable photos; many articles lack good photos of the > most > obvious subjects (though I think the horticultural articles are not the > sinners > in chief). > >