Be aware The Plant List is usually slow to update recent changes and new species. If something is not included it only means it's just not listed. In theory if it is generally accepted as a synonym it would still be listed there. It seems none of the new species from the monograph are listed. I don't think any of these are contested. I know of many changes in Zingiberaceae that are widely accepted that aren't listed there correctly. It's a useful resource but has its limitations Tim Chapman >, > > Lachenalia canaliculata does not appear to be generally accepted - it is > not on The Plant List, (but is on Kew e-monocots). > > Does anyone have an opinion if this species is worthy of inclusion in > the PBS wiki? > > > > > -- >