Maybe it's fun for some. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Nathan Lange <plantsman@comcast.net> wrote: > > Even if these numbers were correct, what is the point of reporting the > Google results? > > Nathan > > > At 10:04 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote: > >> Good spot Ken. I was using the spelling in the subject heading in the >> previous post which I think originally came from you and was repeated by a >> number of others and it was wrong and I didn't catch it and then I repeated >> it. And it will remain forever misspelled in our archives. And yes it is >> very easy to do and probably why there are a lot of plant names on the >> Internet spelled more than one way. >> Scilla madeiriensis 76,800 Google hits >> Scilla maderensis 19,200 Google hits >> Scilla maderiensis 308 Google hits with a number of them from the pbs >> list. >> >> Mary Sue >> > > _______________________________________________ > pbs mailing list > pbs@lists.ibiblio.org > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/ >