Scilla madeiriensis, was Scilla maderiensis

Jude Haverington tylus.seklos@gmail.com
Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:12:42 PDT
Maybe it's fun for some.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Nathan Lange <plantsman@comcast.net> wrote:

>
> Even if these numbers were correct, what is the point of reporting the
> Google results?
>
> Nathan
>
>
> At 10:04 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
>
>> Good spot Ken. I was using the spelling in the subject heading in the
>> previous post  which I think originally came from you and was repeated by a
>> number of others and it was wrong and I didn't catch it and then I repeated
>> it.  And it will remain forever misspelled in our archives. And yes it is
>> very easy to do and probably why there are a lot of plant names on the
>> Internet spelled more than one way.
>> Scilla madeiriensis 76,800  Google hits
>> Scilla maderensis 19,200  Google hits
>> Scilla maderiensis 308  Google hits with a number of them from the pbs
>> list.
>>
>> Mary Sue
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pbs mailing list
> pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
> http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/
>





More information about the pbs mailing list