Dear All, A number of years ago Jim Robinett asked me to collect bulbs that he could no longer grow and find another home for them. With some help from others I managed to distribute these treasures and kept some of them. He had not been able to care for all of them as he would have liked because of health problems and tags had been lost and I have over the years slowly been figuring some of them out that either did not have a tag or were misidentified. One pot was labeled Lachenalia unifolia. I kept some and shared others with the Mendocino Coast Botanical Gardens. I very soon knew this one was wrong. For one thing there were lots of leaves, not one and they didn't look exactly like Lachenalia leaves. Secondly it seemed to have perennial roots. I wasn't quite sure what to do with them, but did let them go dormant assuming it was some kind of South African winter rainfall plant, but because of the perennial roots occasionally gave the pot some summer water. Also I kept giving them bigger pots as they seemed to need more room, but there were no blooms. I planted a few out in a raised bed dry in summer and they came back but did not get bigger. The ones in containers that got better soil and occasional summer water and fertilizer had larger and more leaves. This winter while attending a talk at the Mendocino Coast Botanical Gardens in late January and looking through the bulb collection I saw a blooming stalk starting. And it looked like the beginning of a Scilla peruviana bloom to me so I suspected it was going to be a Scilla of some kind. I am posting a picture on the wiki Mystery page supplied me by the Plant Recorder at the gardens. Lily said she thought it looked different from the Scilla peruviana in the Gardens that are growing in the ground. What does everyone think? Should we rename this Scilla peruviana or could it be something else? What should we be looking for in figuring it out? http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/files/… Thanks for the help. Mary Sue
