Dear All, I got a private confirmation that the photo from Wave Hill was of Moraea vegeta, not M. gawleri with the comment to look at the leaves. "According to Goldblatt - The Moraeas of Southern Africa - more vegetation = vegeta". So I have renamed it and moved it. I decided for sure that the Moraea I am growing that is now flowering is vegeta too. The seed pods are distinctive. So once again in spite of getting it from what I thought was a reliable source I still don't have Moraea papilionacea. Bob Werra tells me he hasn't had luck with it either so maybe it isn't meant to grow in Northern California. I took a picture of my Moraea vegeta plants yesterday since there were a lot of blooms and was reminded of a comment by Will Ashburner that he thought his Moraeas bloomed best the first year they bloomed from seed. Anyone else have this experience? I hunted through the digital pictures my husband took in South Africa to see if I could find any that we thought could be M. gawleri and found three. I hope I am right. I've added them to the wiki. While I was at it I found some other wild flowering Moraeas so also added pictures of Moraea neglecta and Moraea thomasiae. When we spent the day looking for animals in the Bontebok Park we saw more flowers than animals and there were about five or six different species of Moraea in bloom if I recall correctly so two of the pictures were taken there. I also added a picture of M. tulbaghensis taken in Gordon Summerfield's collection. One of these days there also will be some pictures from Bob Werra's collection. Our Moraea wiki page is getting very long in spite of our separating out Galaxia, Homeria, and Gynandriris. It's a large genus so am not quite sure how else we could divide it. Mary Sue