Neomarica

Peter Taggart petersirises@gmail.com
Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:46:56 PST
Two cypellas pictured here,
Peter (UK)
http://srgc.org.uk/forum/index.php/…

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Peter Taggart <petersirises@gmail.com>wrote:

> I quite agree about the problems of using the Inness book!
> Also it is very cautios over the growing conditions for plants. Not every
> picture is correctly named if I remember right. What it does do is collect
> an awfull lot of names together along with the names of the botanists who
> published those names.
> Peter (UK)
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Mary Sue Ittner <msittner@mcn.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> I have the Innes book but I don't usually think
>> of it for current taxonomy since it was published
>> in 1985. But without good sources about South
>> American irids it is a help because at least it
>> has descriptions of plants as they were known at
>> that time. There isn't a key and they don't
>> always include the same things in the
>> descriptions which makes comparing a bit of a challenge.
>>
>>



More information about the pbs mailing list