Peyote??

Jadeboy48@aol.com Jadeboy48@aol.com
Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:07:59 PDT
Tim , you need to do some research on this cactus because I think you  
confused it with something else. Best wishes-Russ H,
 
 
In a message dated 4/6/2013 11:47:35 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
tim@gingerwoodnursery.com writes:


Lophophora williamsii is a schedule 1 drug plant. All parts of  it growing 
or not are Illegal to possess without a DEA license.  I can  assure you 
cactus bowl sellers do not have DEA licenses.  I don't know  the date of it 
becoming scheduled so perhaps it was available in the past. It  is clearly on 
the list now. 

I don't grow any cactus so don't know  about this genus and its other spp , 
but California's own law forbids growing  ANY species in this genus. 

Tim Chapman

> I do not agree with  you.  Lophophora williamsii is a well known plant.  
It is 
>  similar to L. diffusa, but they can be distinguished.  When I lived in  
L.A., 
> I was somewhat of an expert on cactus and grew many.   Among my plants 
was L. 
> williamsii, and of course it flowered for  me.  
_______________________________________________
pbs mailing  list
pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/




More information about the pbs mailing list