Nhu wrote: > So what you're saying is that there is no monograph for Narcissus?? I'm almost at a loss for words I was the perpetrator of some of the edits to the narcissus section on the wiki, and I agree. In my opinion, the problem isn't that there is no monograph, it's that there have been too many of them. The genus has been studied to death for hundreds of years by splitters and lumpers, in some cases it's no longer clear what's wild and what is cultivated stock dating back to the Romans, and the genus itself is extremely variable, with many intermediates between the various characteristics. The more closely you look, the more confusing the picture becomes. Personal opinion: we won't be able to really make sense of the genus without genetic analysis. Mike San Jose, CA