Hi Leo- I have an array of Hyacinthaceae species, assuming they are correctly ID'd in the first place - that are not on the Wiki. Albuca, Ornithogalum are two genera that come to mind. I know there have been a lot of taxonomic changes; and I am able to determine the latest placement. I then check the Wiki, iSpot, Google images, Flickr general search, sometimes Photobucket. All but the Wiki are a shot in the dark, meaning the info isn't really reliable - but it's a start. Usually; the best I can do with the other sources is (based on consensus) determine that I have an improperly ID'd plant. Which is fine for now. I keep a database of what I have, make notes if an item is of questionable name, etc. I've been taking pictures of all details that I hope will help ID a plant. But, like Jude, I would like to see a faster way to ask a question using an attached picture. I reserve my Flickr account for my best pictures, and don't want NOIDS on it. I have no intention of learning how to submit items on the Wiki at this time. Later, I do hope to contribute; but I am still trying to learn what separates various species. I am thankful for the detail and effort put into the Wiki. However, sometimes, the array of pictures does not show an image of the foliage close-up, and other details that would assist in making a proper ID. Ideally, and when I start to create a pictorial catalog of my plants, I would have one of the bulb, foliage, flower, specific identifiers and the seed. I should also include some dimensions as I catalog. Best regards, Lisa Subject: Re: [pbs] Wiki contributions One reason additions to the Wiki have slowed is that so many bulbs are already there. There aren't too many more about which something is known or photographs are available. Leo Martin