geophyte or not

Nhu Nguyen xerantheum@gmail.com
Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:07:31 PST
Agreed. Nicely put, Dylan. I'll add the idea of splitting these marginal
taxa to project #28 on our wiki  "to do" list. Now, if anyone is interested
in donating about 50 hours of their time to this project, please contact
me. It is not a small undertaking every time we have to change the
structure of the wiki. Every relevant link on every page has to change to
reflect the new changes.

If folks are interested in what what's behind the scenes and what the
administrators have been thinking and doing for the wiki, you can see what
plans we have here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/…
(tiny URL link: http://tinyurl.com/lhq7qj2/)

We rank certain projects based on their priorities, and some projects such
as adding cultivation info for genera or species comes highest on the list.
I think we can all agree that this information is missing from the majority
of our pages and the payoff to time ratio will be much higher.

If anyone has any interests in any one of these listed projects, please
contact either David Pilling, me, or Mike Mace and we'll set you up!

Nhu

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Hannon <othonna@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree with Alberto that an alternative category like Honorable Mention
> should be created for such plants. This would help avoid controversy and,
> more importantly, help novice readers appreciate the fact that the natural
> world can only be categorized to a certain point.
>



More information about the pbs mailing list