Dare I interject a thought myself? Surely I may! I like to leave the subject line unchanged so that the entire thread can be retraced someday. Indeed that is such a deeply ingrained habit that I now do it without thought. So I suppose both interpretations are correct. I guess we should eally correct the subject line while retaining for at least a few cycles the old subject line in addition. What does our arbiter of linguistic etiquette say? Jane, we are quite lucky to have you here, and even luckier in that you generally put up with our nattering and give us a sensible answer. Jim At 12:22 PM 8/26/2010 -0500, Adam wrote: >Hmmm? Jane? Arbitrator? How about Jim McKenney's query here? Etiquette? >There's ambiguity in the nature of the problem. If it's corrected.. is it >still the subject. Disambiguate please --as in a big Wikipedia ************************************************* Jim Shields USDA Zone 5 Shields Gardens, Ltd. P.O. Box 92 WWW: http://www.shieldsgardens.com/ Westfield, Indiana 46074, USA Tel. ++1-317-867-3344 or toll-free 1-866-449-3344 in USA