Seriously Facebook

clayton3120 clayton3120 clayton3120@cablespeed.com
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:32:03 PST
Great points, Jim.
I agree with Most of what you said.   However, perhaps another question PBS
should discuss is...... how big of a group  do you want PBS to be?
Years ago, I was one of the founders of  a tiny group now HUGE called the
Northwest Perennial Alliance.     The size of a large group requires major
management, finances, and, sadly, dealing with  alot of factions that
aren't always so pleasant, along with untold  other issues you may not have
thought about.  I'm not  suggesting that PBS be a small, elite group. Far
from it.  The inclusion of new members from a broad range of backgrounds
and experiences could only add balance, interest, and  different
perspectives, that I think are healthy for a group of this type.
Putting the group out there in a MAJOR way will certainly help prop up the
numbers etc.    Just be ready

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Peter Taggart <petersirises@gmail.com>wrote:

> nice question Ina!
> Peter (UK)
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ina <klazina@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
>
> > So the page is there. But there is no way to do anything except look at
> > it and like it.  How can it be made to be useful?
> >
> > Ina
> >
> > Ina Crossley
> > Auckland New Zealand  Zone 10
> >
> > On 22/01/2013 11:31 a.m., Steve Marak wrote:
> > > Neither slings nor arrows here, Jim.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pbs mailing list
> > pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
> > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pbs mailing list
> pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
> http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/
>



More information about the pbs mailing list