Inoculating bulbs?

Mike Rummerfield mikerumm@gmail.com
Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:55:58 PST
Travis,
Very good questions.  I have long taken the opposite approach to
sterilization as it's never made biological sense to me.  Plus, it seems it
is often that the pests/pathogens are the first to colonize a sterile
environment.  I always use an unsterilized medium and add beneficial
microbe inoculants, and it usually works for me, though I have no research
on it.

It only makes sense to me that plants/bulbs that have their own
idiosyncratic, symbiotic, synergistic microbes available to them are much
better to ward off pathogens and to thrive; both in the soil, and on the
above ground parts where the beneficials take up all the "real estate" so
that pathogens have nowhere to set up house and do their damage.

Nature has had much longer to work this out than we have.

Hopefully, someone with real knowledge on this subject will respond to your
queries.

An aside:  I do sterilize something like coco husk chips that are imported
from a foreign country so as not to possibly  introduce organisms that are
not native to the local biome, but then reinoculate it.

Regards,
Mike
Washington state
rain, 44℉ (7℃)

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Travis O <enoster@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been reading 'Teaming with Microbes' by Jeff Lowenfels and Wayne
> Lewis (Timber Press 2010) and it has got my imagination going. Most
> gardeners are familiar with or have at least heard of the ability of
> leguminous plants to "fix" nitrogen from the atmosphere into a form plants
> can use, a result of a fungal symbiosis. The book describes in detail the
> complex microscopic ecosystems that inhabit healthy soil and interact, in
> many cases symbiotically and beneficially, with (according to the book) 90%
> of all plants on Earth.
>
> Now it seems that the common practice amongst this group, and many other
> specialized plant groups, is to use completely sterilized soil (or
> "medium"). Could there be a benefit to inoculating our bulb seed, or
> perhaps the dormant bulbs themselves, as one may do with food crops?
>
> To me, it seems entirely reasonable to assume that many wild bulb
> populations have some sort of positive relationship to the microfauna in
> the soil they share. Keeping with this line of reasoning, I wonder if some
> of the "difficult" bulbous species out there, unknown in cultivation, may
> only need the correct fungal association (or bacterial, or whatever) to
> survive in cultivation? Or could using beneficial bacteria/fungi to
> inoculate our current bulbs improve their vigor, or other unforeseen
> benefits?
>
> Is there any research out there on this?
>
> Travis Owen
> Rogue River, OR
>
> http://www.amateuranthecologist.com/
> http://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> pbs mailing list
> pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
> http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/
>
_______________________________________________
pbs mailing list
pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/


More information about the pbs mailing list